When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. LL parser - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LL_parser

    A simple example for left recursion removal: The following production rule has left recursion on E E -> E '+' T E -> T This rule is nothing but list of Ts separated by '+'. In a regular expression form T ('+' T)*. So the rule could be rewritten as E -> T Z Z -> '+' T Z Z -> ε Now there is no left recursion and no conflicts on either of the rules.

  3. Top-down parsing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-down_parsing

    A formal grammar that contains left recursion cannot be parsed by a naive recursive descent parser unless they are converted to a weakly equivalent right-recursive form. . However, recent research demonstrates that it is possible to accommodate left-recursive grammars (along with all other forms of general CFGs) in a more sophisticated top-down parser by use of curta

  4. Code motion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_motion

    A diagram depicting an optimizing compiler removing a potentially useless call to assembly instruction "b" by sinking it to its point of use. Code Sinking, also known as lazy code motion, is a term for a technique that reduces wasted instructions by moving instructions to branches in which they are used: [1] If an operation is executed before a branch, and only one of the branch paths use the ...

  5. Recursive descent parser - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recursive_descent_parser

    The LL(k) grammars therefore exclude all ambiguous grammars, as well as all grammars that contain left recursion. Any context-free grammar can be transformed into an equivalent grammar that has no left recursion, but removal of left recursion does not always yield an LL(k) grammar. A predictive parser runs in linear time.

  6. LALR parser - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LALR_parser

    In the LALR table construction, two states will be merged into one state and later the lookaheads will be found to be ambiguous. The one state with lookaheads is: E → e. {c,d} F → e. {c,d} An LR(1) parser will create two different states (with non-conflicting lookaheads), neither of which is ambiguous.

  7. Compiler - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compiler

    Compiler technology evolved from the need for a strictly defined transformation of the high-level source program into a low-level target program for the digital computer. The compiler could be viewed as a front end to deal with the analysis of the source code and a back end to synthesize the analysis into the target code.

  8. Left recursion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_recursion

    Left recursion is commonly used as an idiom for making operations left-associative: that an expression a+b-c-d+e is evaluated as (((a+b)-c)-d)+e. In this case, that evaluation order could be achieved as a matter of syntax via the three grammatical rules

  9. Context-free grammar - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context-free_grammar

    Context-free grammars are simple enough to allow the construction of efficient parsing algorithms that, for a given string, determine whether and how it can be generated from the grammar. An Earley parser is an example of such an algorithm, while the widely used LR and LL parsers are simpler algorithms that deal only with more restrictive ...