Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The biconditional is true in two cases, where either both statements are true or both are false. The connective is biconditional (a statement of material equivalence), [2] and can be likened to the standard material conditional ("only if", equal to "if ... then") combined with its reverse ("if"); hence the name. The result is that the truth of ...
Venn diagram of (true part in red) In logic and mathematics, the logical biconditional, also known as material biconditional or equivalence or bidirectional implication or biimplication or bientailment, is the logical connective used to conjoin two statements and to form the statement "if and only if" (often abbreviated as "iff " [1]), where is known as the antecedent, and the consequent.
Examples: The column-14 operator (OR), shows Addition rule : when p =T (the hypothesis selects the first two lines of the table), we see (at column-14) that p ∨ q =T. We can see also that, with the same premise, another conclusions are valid: columns 12, 14 and 15 are T.
[35] [36] In English, these connectives are expressed by the words "and" (conjunction), "or" (disjunction), "not" , "if" (material conditional), and "if and only if" (biconditional). [1] [13] Examples of such compound sentences might include: Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and millions already have. (conjunction ...
material biconditional (material equivalence) if and only if, iff, xnor propositional logic, Boolean algebra: is true only if both A and B are false, or both A and B are true. Whether a symbol means a material biconditional or a logical equivalence, depends on the author’s style.
Some authors used letters for connectives: . for conjunction (German's "und" for "and") and . for disjunction (German's "oder" for "or") in early works by Hilbert (1904); [16] for negation, for conjunction, for alternative denial, for disjunction, for implication, for biconditional in Łukasiewicz in 1929.
Here is an example of an argument that fits the form conjunction introduction: Bob likes apples. Bob likes oranges. Therefore, Bob likes apples and Bob likes oranges. Conjunction elimination is another classically valid, simple argument form. Intuitively, it permits the inference from any conjunction of either element of that conjunction.
In propositional logic, material implication [1] [2] is a valid rule of replacement that allows a conditional statement to be replaced by a disjunction in which the antecedent is negated. The rule states that P implies Q is logically equivalent to not-or and that either form can replace the other in logical proofs.