When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: recent eminent domain cases private property state of oklahoma

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. 'We wanted to stay there forever': This Oklahoma family was ...

    www.aol.com/finance/wanted-stay-forever-oklahoma...

    The Brewers received a 30-day notice to vacate their home back in 2018 after it was seized by the state through eminent domain — which is when governments take over private property for public use.

  3. Does the turnpike authority have an unfair advantage over ...

    www.aol.com/does-turnpike-authority-unfair...

    The home was acquired through eminent domain and destroyed by the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority in 2018. ... condemning their property in an ongoing expansion of the state’s toll road network ...

  4. Turnpike's land seizure, other eminent domain acts could mean ...

    www.aol.com/logic-eminent-domain-private...

    Eminent domain claims can make the case that your property would better serve the public if it was not yours, but rather everyone’s. Turnpike's land seizure, other eminent domain acts could mean ...

  5. Eminent domain in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain_in_the...

    The property of subjects is under the eminent domain of the state, so that the state or he who acts for it may use and even alienate and destroy such property, not only in the case of extreme necessity, in which even private persons have a right over the property of others, but for ends of public utility, to which ends those who founded civil ...

  6. Kelo v. City of New London - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

    Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development does not violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

  7. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Relocation...

    The Fifth Amendment's Takings clause does not provide for the compensation of relocation expenses if the government takes a citizen's property. [1] Therefore, until 1962, citizens displaced by a federal project were guaranteed just compensation for the property taken by the government, but had no legal right or benefit for the expenses they paid to relocate.

  8. Supreme Court Can Protect Property Owners From Eminent Domain ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-protect-property...

    City of New London, which blessed the use of eminent domain to promote economic development by transferring property from one private owner to another. Bowers' case offers the justices another ...

  9. United States v. Jones (1883) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Jones_(1883)

    Jones, 109 U.S. 513 (1883), is an important decision by the United States Supreme Court which provides the power to take private property for public uses, in the exercise of the right of eminent domain, to the government of the United States. However, once the government exercises of the right of eminent domain and after a fair determination of ...