Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Quoting out of context (sometimes referred to as contextomy or quote mining) is an informal fallacy in which a passage is removed from its surrounding matter in such a way as to distort its intended meaning. [1] Context may be omitted intentionally or accidentally, thinking it to be non-essential.
A reliable newspaper quotes a victorious athlete as saying "Today is one of the greatest days in my life". Years later, an obituary in another paper renders the quote as "Today is the greatest day of my life". A contemporaneous source makes a claim that is explicitly called out as wrong by reliable non-contemporaneous sources.
A "judicial opinion" or "opinion of the court" is an opinion of a judge or group of judges that accompanies and explains an order or ruling in a controversy before the court. A judicial opinion generally lays out the facts that the court recognized as being established, the legal principles the court is bound by, and the application of the ...
We have facts, like dates of publication; opinions, like information about any meaning or message contained in the work; facts about opinions, like who believes the work has a certain meaning; and opinions about opinions, like beliefs about people who believe the work has a certain meaning. The second perspective is the plot.
Quote boxes should generally be avoided as they draw attention to the opinion of one source as though Wikipedia endorses it, which may violate the neutral point of view policy. Avoid stand-alone quote sections; use Wikiquote instead. The {} template can be used in Wikipedia articles to indicate there are relevant quotes at Wikiquote.
It can be included as a factual statement about the opinion: "John Doe's baseball skills have been praised by baseball insiders such as Al Kaline and Joe Torre." Opinions must still be verifiable and appropriately cited. Another approach is to specify or substantiate the statement, by giving those details that actually are factual. For example ...
Peek through these other quotes that proved to be painfully wrong. Hindsight really is 20/20. The Decca records executive who said that was probably kicking himself for many years to come.
Whether one has a particular entitlement or right is irrelevant to whether one's assertion is true or false. Where an objection to a belief is made, the assertion of the right to an opinion side-steps the usual steps of discourse of either asserting a justification of that belief, or an argument against the validity of the objection. [4]