When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: well written feature articles examples

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Featured articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_articles

    They are used by editors as examples for writing other articles. Before being listed here, articles are reviewed as featured article candidates for accuracy, neutrality, completeness, and style according to our featured article criteria. Many featured articles were previously good articles (which are reviewed with a less restrictive set of ...

  3. Wikipedia:Good articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_articles

    A good article (GA) is a Wikipedia article that meets a core set of editorial standards, the good article criteria, passing through the good article nomination process successfully. They are well-written, contain factually accurate and verifiable information, are broad in coverage, neutral in point of view , stable, and illustrated, where ...

  4. Wikipedia:Featured article criteria - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article...

    well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive : it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched : it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations ...

  5. Wikipedia : Compare criteria Good v. Featured article

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Compare_criteria...

    Featured articles must be our very best work; good articles meet a more basic set of core editorial standards and are decent. A good article must be well written; a featured article must have an engaging, professional standard of writing. A good article must comply with only five style guidelines; featured articles must comply with all style ...

  6. Wikipedia:Content assessment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_assessment

    The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required.

  7. Wikipedia:Featured article candidates - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article...

    Thanks for the ping! I will read through the article again during the weekend to make sure I did not miss anything at the PR. Just two comments for now. The names and locations of studios in the infobox seem to be separated by brackets instead of commas on the other 1989 articles. The sample caption does not need a period as there is no main ...

  8. Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reviewing_good...

    Avoid commenting on the perceived "merit" of the subject of the article. If an article on a porn star is well-written, well-organized, well-referenced, and follows the specific content policies and style guidelines that are required by the GA criteria, then you should not fail it because you think Wikipedia has too many articles on porn stars.

  9. Wikipedia : Good articles/History

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_articles/...

    A good article (GA) is a Wikipedia article that meets a core set of editorial standards, the good article criteria, passing through the good article nomination process successfully. They are well-written, contain factually accurate and verifiable information, are broad in coverage, neutral in point of view , stable, and illustrated, where ...