Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The White House said Friday it approved another $4.28 billion in student debt cancellation for 54,900 additional public service workers in what could be one of the Biden Administration's final act ...
While the FCC had previously been considered to have the ability to make such rulings under the Chevron deference as a result of National Cable & Telecommunications Ass'n v. Brand X Internet Services , the Sixth Circuit ruled in January 2025 that the FCC's rule making to support net neutrality was incompatible with the Telecommunications Act of ...
As of 2018, the Supreme Court had overruled more than 300 of its own cases. [1] The longest period between the original decision and the overruling decision is 136 years, for the common law Admiralty cases Minturn v. Maynard, 58 U.S. (17 How.) 476 decision in 1855, overruled by the Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines Inc., 500 U.S. 603 decision ...
WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden announced Thursday that the White House has approved the cancellation of nearly $6 billion in federal student debt for thousands of public service workers.
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), abbreviated Janus v.AFSCME, is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law, concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members.
After making what it called “significant fixes” to the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program, the Biden administration on Thursday is announcing the approval of $4.5 billion in ...
United Public Workers v. Mitchell , 330 U.S. 75 (1947), is a 4-to-3 ruling by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Hatch Act of 1939 , as amended in 1940, does not violate the First , Fifth , Ninth , or Tenth amendments to U.S. Constitution .
Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 236 U.S. 230 (1915), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling by a 9–0 vote that the free speech protection of the Ohio Constitution, which was substantially similar to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, did not extend to motion pictures.