Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the ...
This template should be used when the article appears to have been written by a reviewer on behalf of the subject of the article, or having some connection with the subject. It is used when the article is not necessarily representing a blatant opinion or opinion piece, but is still overly judgemental in tone.
Random article; About Wikipedia; ... 3 Categories for pages using these templates. ... Toggle the table of contents. Template: Academic-written review/doc. Add ...
Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects Wikidata item; Appearance. move to sidebar hide. Template documentation. This is a group of templates which aim ...
A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. Peer review of "Homemaking" Peer review of this article about a famous painting
Template: CF/Good articles in need of review. Add languages. Add links. Template; Talk; English ...
The process of review articles being peer-reviewed is critical to their credibility. [9] The peer review process is a way to ensure the article is as polished and accurate as possible. Most often, those reviewing the article are fellow academics or experts within the field under discussion in the paper.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us