Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
“The need to adjust the fee comes down to the city’s ability to allow residential and commercial projects to continue to be developed.” 40+ builders, property owners ask Pasco to repeal 140% ...
National Association of Realtors (formerly Sitzer v. National Association of Realtors ) is a class-action lawsuit challenging the fees charged by real estate agents in the United States. The case was filed against the National Association of Realtors and some of the largest brokerages in the country.
The Supreme Court says home builders in California may challenge the fees commonly imposed by cities and counties to pay for new infrastructure. Builders may fight 'impact fees' that fund ...
Any fees higher than the normal fees of the legal practitioner concerned may not exceed such normal fees by more than 100%. However, in claims sounding in money, the total of any such success fee payable by the client to the legal practitioner may not exceed 25% of the total amount awarded or any amount obtained by the client in consequence of ...
In December, a group of 41 Tri-City developers, builders, real estate agents and property owners asked the city to rescind the acquisition fee and form a steering committee to further study the issue.
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), abbreviated Janus v.AFSCME, is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law, concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members.
The rationale for the English rule is that a litigant (whether bringing a claim or defending a claim) is entitled to legal representation and, if successful, should not be left out of pocket by reason of their own legal fees. It should be borne in mind that, in virtually all English civil litigation, damages are merely compensatory.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us