When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: south carolina v katzenbach summary of case law supreme court retroactive

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. South Carolina v. Katzenbach - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Carolina_v._Katzenbach

    South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that rejected a challenge from the state of South Carolina to the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required that some states submit changes in election districts to the Attorney General of the United States (at the time, Nicholas Katzenbach). [1]

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 383

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    South Carolina v. Katzenbach: 383 U.S. 301: 1966: Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp. 383 U.S. 363: ... United States Supreme Court cases in volume 383 (Open Jurist)

  4. Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965

    The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of the Section 5 preclearance requirement in three cases. The first case was South Carolina v. Katzenbach (1966), [171] which was decided about five months after the Act's enactment. The court held that Section 5 constituted a valid use of Congress's power to enforce the Fifteenth Amendment ...

  5. Supreme Court Says Unanimous Verdict Rule Is Not Retroactive

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-says-unanimous-verdict...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Early voting is biggest expansion of voting rights in recent ...

    www.aol.com/news/early-voting-biggest-expansion...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Supreme Court delay prompts federal judges to act in South ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-delay-prompts...

    Oral arguments in the South Carolina case were held on Oct. 11, giving the justices ample time to rule. State officials had argued their sole goal was to increase the Republican tilt in the ...

  8. Katzenbach v. McClung - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katzenbach_v._McClung

    Katzenbach v. McClung , 379 U.S. 294 (1964), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court which unanimously held that Congress acted within its power under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution in forbidding racial discrimination in restaurants as this was a burden to interstate commerce .

  9. Katzenbach - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katzenbach

    South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 1966 case which rejected a challenge by the state of South Carolina to the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required that some states submit changes in election districts to the Attorney General of the United States (at the time, Nicholas Katzenbach).