Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Venn diagram of = . The symmetric difference is equivalent to the union of both relative complements, that is: [1] = (), The symmetric difference can also be expressed using the XOR operation ⊕ on the predicates describing the two sets in set-builder notation:
For example, if number => number is the type of function taking a number as an argument and returning a number, and string => string is the type of function taking a string as an argument and returning a string, then the intersection of these two types can be used to describe (overloaded) functions that do one or the other, based on what type ...
In this Boolean algebra, union can be expressed in terms of intersection and complementation by the formula = (), where the superscript denotes the complement in the universal set . Alternatively, intersection can be expressed in terms of union and complementation in a similar way: A ∩ B = ( A ∁ ∪ B ∁ ) ∁ {\displaystyle A\cap B ...
So if f is a function and x is in its domain, then f ′ x is f(x). f ″ X f ″ X is the image of a set X by f. If f is a function whose domain contains X this is {f(x):x∈X} [ ] 1. M[G] is the smallest model of ZF containing G and all elements of M. 2. [α] β is the set of all subsets of a set α of cardinality β, or of an ordered set α ...
One common convention is to associate intersection = {: ()} with logical conjunction (and) and associate union = {: ()} with logical disjunction (or), and then transfer the precedence of these logical operators (where has precedence over ) to these set operators, thereby giving precedence over .
So the intersection of the empty family should be the universal set (the identity element for the operation of intersection), [4] but in standard set theory, the universal set does not exist. However, when restricted to the context of subsets of a given fixed set X {\displaystyle X} , the notion of the intersection of an empty collection of ...
The algebra of sets is the set-theoretic analogue of the algebra of numbers. Just as arithmetic addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, so are set union and intersection; just as the arithmetic relation "less than or equal" is reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, so is the set relation of "subset".
Additionally, while a collection of less than two sets is trivially disjoint, as there are no pairs to compare, the intersection of a collection of one set is equal to that set, which may be non-empty. [2] For instance, the three sets { {1, 2}, {2, 3}, {1, 3} } have an empty intersection but are not disjoint. In fact, there are no two disjoint ...