Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
One common convention is to associate intersection = {: ()} with logical conjunction (and) and associate union = {: ()} with logical disjunction (or), and then transfer the precedence of these logical operators (where has precedence over ) to these set operators, thereby giving precedence over .
For example, if number => number is the type of function taking a number as an argument and returning a number, and string => string is the type of function taking a string as an argument and returning a string, then the intersection of these two types can be used to describe (overloaded) functions that do one or the other, based on what type ...
The same fact can be stated as the indicator function (denoted here by ) of the symmetric difference, being the XOR (or addition mod 2) of the indicator functions of its two arguments: () = or using the Iverson bracket notation [] = [] [].
The algebra of sets is the set-theoretic analogue of the algebra of numbers. Just as arithmetic addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, so are set union and intersection; just as the arithmetic relation "less than or equal" is reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, so is the set relation of "subset".
In this Boolean algebra, union can be expressed in terms of intersection and complementation by the formula = (), where the superscript denotes the complement in the universal set . Alternatively, intersection can be expressed in terms of union and complementation in a similar way: A ∩ B = ( A ∁ ∪ B ∁ ) ∁ {\displaystyle A\cap B ...
So the intersection of the empty family should be the universal set (the identity element for the operation of intersection), [4] but in standard set theory, the universal set does not exist. However, when restricted to the context of subsets of a given fixed set X {\displaystyle X} , the notion of the intersection of an empty collection of ...
C# 3.0 introduced type inference, allowing the type specifier of a variable declaration to be replaced by the keyword var, if its actual type can be statically determined from the initializer. This reduces repetition, especially for types with multiple generic type-parameters , and adheres more closely to the DRY principle.
Hom(A, –) maps each morphism f : X → Y to the function Hom(A, f) : Hom(A, X) → Hom(A, Y) given by for each g in Hom(A, X). This is a contravariant functor given by: Hom(–, B) maps each object X in C to the set of morphisms, Hom(X, B) Hom(–, B) maps each morphism h : X → Y to the function