When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: cal eprocure contract search california case law
  2. legal.thomsonreuters.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month

    • Legal Cases

      Quickly Find On-Point Cases that

      Address Your Specific Legal Issue.

    • Start Your Free Trial

      Access a Free Trial of Westlaw

      Precision to Research Faster.

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armendariz_v._Foundation...

    Full case name: Marybeth Armendariz et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., Defendant and Appellant. Citation(s) 24 Cal. 4th 83, 6 P.3d 669; 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d. 745: Holding; A contract must contain both a prodecural and substantiative element of unconscionability in order to be void.

  3. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamex_Operations_West...

    Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior Court and Charles Lee, Real Party in Interest, 4 Cal.5th 903 (Cal. 2018) was a landmark case handed down by the California Supreme Court on April 30, 2018. A class of drivers for a same-day delivery company, Dynamex, claimed that they were misclassified as independent contractors and thus unlawfully deprived of ...

  4. Tunkl v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunkl_v._Regents_of_the...

    This case history arose in relation to Cal. Civ. Code §1668, a statute that states "All contracts which have for their object, directly or indirectly, to exempt anyone from responsibility for his own fraud, or willful injury to the person or property of another, or violation of law, whether willful or negligent, are against the policy of the ...

  5. Drennan v. Star Paving Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drennan_v._Star_Paving_Co.

    Drennan v. Star Paving Company, 51 Cal. 2d 409 (1958), was a California Supreme Court case in which the court held that a party who has detrimentally relied on an offer that is revoked prior to acceptance may assert promissory estoppel to recover damages. [1]

  6. Category:California state case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:California_state...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more

  7. Category:Supreme Court of California tort case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Supreme_Court_of...

    Pages in category "Supreme Court of California tort case law" The following 2 pages are in this category, out of 2 total. This list may not reflect recent changes .

  1. Ad

    related to: cal eprocure contract search california case law