When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_reporting_items...

    The PRISMA flow diagram, depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based minimum set of items aimed at helping scientific authors to report a wide array of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily used to assess the benefits and harms of a health care ...

  3. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient-Reported_Outcomes...

    Further, PROMIS tools allow for computer adaptive testing, efficiently achieving precise measurement of health status domains with few items. There are PROMIS measures for both adults and children. PROMIS was established in 2004 with funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as one of the initiatives of the NIH Roadmap for Medical ...

  4. Template:Academic-written review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Academic-written...

    Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the ...

  5. IMRAD - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMRAD

    In scientific writing, IMRAD or IMRaD (/ ˈ ɪ m r æ d /) (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) [1] is a common organizational structure for the format of a document. IMRaD is the most prominent norm for the structure of a scientific journal article of the original research type.

  6. Template:Cite book - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_book

    This template is used on approximately 1,750,000 pages, or roughly 3% of all pages. To avoid major disruption and server load, any changes should be tested in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage.

  7. Template:B-class review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:B-class_review

    B-class review This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria. It is suitably referenced, with in-line citation :

  8. Template:Science review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Science_review

    This article reads like a scientific review article and potentially contains biased syntheses of primary sources. Please replace inadequate primary references with secondary sources. See the talk page for details.

  9. Template:Peer review/doc - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Peer_review/doc

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us