Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Battle for Dream Island (BFDI) is an animated web series on YouTube created by Chinese-American twin brothers Cary and Michael Huang. As the series has over 1.9 billion total views, [a] you may be surprised that Wikipedia does not have an article for this series.
The Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (BfDI, German: Bundesbeauftragter für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit), referring to either a person or the agency they lead, is tasked with supervising data protection as well as acting in an ombudsman function in freedom of information.
A5: Even if we had the reliable sources to verify this, this wouldn't make BFDI notable. A hypothetical article on Wikipedia about the series would explain to a layperson (someone who isn't a part of the OSC) what BFDI is about. We are talking about the series, not the merchandise.
However, this case was dismissed although the judge cited that there was a single instance of original copyright, but this was not sufficient evidence to support copyright infringement. Additionally, the judge cited Nester's Map & Guide Corp. v. Hagstrom Map Co. as previous case law to support that "fictitious names may not be copyrighted" and ...
Has become a generic term for an excavator mounted with both a front loader and a backhoe in British English, as recognized by the Oxford English Dictionary. [132] Invented by J C Bamford Excavators Ltd., which is still the largest supplier of backhoe loaders. [133] Jeep: Compact sport utility vehicle: Chrysler, part of Stellantis
A2: Wikipedians are not "biased" against BFDI. The creation of a Battle for Dream Island article is simply not allowed because the topic lacks notability and overly enthusiastic fans have repeatedly recreated it despite consensus favoring its deletion.
If bfdi is not allowed on wikipedia since it currently has no reliable sources. Then shouldn’t this essay be deleted?, this essay has the same amount of reliability as bfdi’s sources, which resulted to it’s deletion, speaking of the fact, there is a space in the essay where it explains bfdi (as an unreliable source) which means it doesn’t belong on wikipedia, if it is on this essay ...
Royalty-free standards do not include any "per-port" or "per-volume" charges or annual payments for the actual implementation of the standard, even though the text of the actual specification is typically protected by copyright and needs to be purchased from the standards body.