When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Stipulated removal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stipulated_removal

    Stipulated removal is a summary deportation procedure used in immigration enforcement in the United States.Stipulated removal occurs when a noncitizen who is facing removal proceedings and is scheduled for a hearing with an immigration judge signs a document stipulating that he/she is waiving the right to trial and to appeal, and is prepared to be removed immediately.

  3. Pereira v. Sessions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pereira_v._Sessions

    Pereira v. Sessions, Attorney General, no. 17-459, 585 U.S (2018), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding immigration.In an 8-1 majority, the Court reversed a lower court's decision by ruling that a Notice to Appear which does not inform a noncitizen when and where to appear for a removal proceeding is not valid under 8 U.S. Code § 1229(b) and therefore does not trigger the stop-time ...

  4. List of United States Supreme Court immigration case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94 (1884) – Court held that even though Elk was born in the United States, he was not a citizen because he owed allegiance to his tribe when he was born rather than to the U.S. and therefore was not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States when he was born.

  5. Reinstatement of removal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinstatement_of_removal

    The immigration officer's decision is considered final and there is no scope for appeal within the immigration enforcement bureaucracy. However, courts of appeals in all jurisdictions in the United States have ruled that a noncitizen may appeal a reinstatement order to the court of appeals in the jurisdiction within 30 days of the reinstatement ...

  6. The migrants on the frontline of Trump’s mass deportation plan

    www.aol.com/news/migrants-frontline-trump-mass...

    Figueroa, 36, crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally in 2016 and was ordered deported after she missed an immigration court hearing that November. She met Martinez, 64, later that year, when ...

  7. Padilla v. Kentucky - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padilla_v._Kentucky

    The Court mitigated this newly imposed duty somewhat by holding that when the immigration consequences are not certain and clear, a criminal defense attorney must simply advise the client that a conviction may affect the client's immigration status. [14] The Court reasoned that immigration law is a separate legal field that is complex and may ...

  8. Supreme Court unanimous ruling may pave way for mass ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-unanimous-ruling-may...

    (The Center Square) – A unanimous ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court may pave the way for challenges to a federal deportation plan under the incoming Trump administration to be defeated.

  9. Kazarian v. USCIS - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazarian_v._USCIS

    The memo proposed using the two-step process proposed by the court in its decision on the case. The memo accordingly announced corresponding changes to the Adjudicator's Field Manual (Chapter 22.2, with the update called AFM Update AD11-14), the manual used by USCIS officers (known as Immigration Service Officers, or ISOs) while adjudicating cases.