When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Good article criteria - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article...

    Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and; it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. [1] Verifiable with no original research: [2]

  3. Wikipedia:Good articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_articles

    They are well-written, contain factually accurate and verifiable information, are broad in coverage, neutral in point of view, stable, and illustrated, where possible, by relevant images with suitable copyright licenses.

  4. Wikipedia:Content assessment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_assessment

    well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive : it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched : it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations ...

  5. Wikipedia:Article development - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_development

    The vast majority of articles fall into this category. They may have weaknesses, so you are encouraged to copyedit them and, where you have the knowledge or do the necessary research, to add content. As an article is improved in quality it goes through stages of development. Here is an example of the evolution of an article.

  6. Article (publishing) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_(publishing)

    Investigative reports and enterprise news reports, based on the journalist's decision to investigate a subject that has not been publicized Lead-alls , a central article that provides an overview of major news events and connects to related articles on narrower subjects; [ 1 ]

  7. Academic writing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_writing

    Academic style has often been criticized for being too full of jargon and hard to understand by the general public. [11] [12] In 2022, Joelle Renstrom argued that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on academic writing and that many scientific articles now "contain more jargon than ever, which encourages misinterpretation, political spin, and a declining public trust in the ...

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...