When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Good article criteria - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article...

    Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and; it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. [1] Verifiable with no original research: [2]

  3. Wikipedia:Good articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_articles

    If it meets the criteria, it is added to the list of good articles below. There are instructions for nominators and reviewers. Similarly, anyone who believes that an article no longer meets the good article criteria may propose to delist it by following the instructions for reassessment. More good content is available at Wikipedia:Good topics

  4. Wikipedia:Content assessment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_assessment

    well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive : it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched : it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations ...

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    a list of sources that have never been discussed, or whose reliability should be obvious to most editors; a list of primary, secondary, or tertiary sources; a list of independent or affiliated sources; a list of self-published and non–self-published sources; a representative sample of all sources used on Wikipedia or all sources in existence

  6. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...

  7. Lists of academic journals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_academic_journals

    List of public relations journals; List of scientific journals; List of sexology journals; List of Slavic studies journals; List of social science journals; List of sociology journals; List of statistics journals; List of systems science journals; List of textile science journals; List of theology journals; List of undergraduate research ...

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Report - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Report

    A report is a document or a statement that presents information in an organized format for a specific audience and purpose. Although summaries of reports may be delivered orally, complete reports are usually given in the form of written documents. [1] [2] Typically reports relay information that was found or observed. [2]