When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. U.S. Government peer review policies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Government_peer...

    The peer review Bulletin specifically addresses the effect of publication in a refereed scientific journal as well the variations and limitations with peer review: Publication in a refereed scientific journal may mean that adequate peer review has been performed. However, the intensity of peer review is highly variable across journals.

  3. Peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review

    Peer review in writing is a pivotal component among various peer review mechanisms, often spearheaded by educators and involving student participation, particularly in academic settings. It constitutes a fundamental process in academic and professional writing, serving as a systematic means to ensure the quality, effectiveness, and credibility ...

  4. Wikipedia:Reliability of open government data - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliability_of...

    A possible approach could be to associate a Bayesian probability for the credibility of each source of open government data, where the individual probabilities are generated from peer-reviewed research, [5] [1] [4] [2] preprint research (itself with a lower Bayesian probability of being correct), and media articles (with bayesian probabilities ...

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    A claim of peer review is not an indication that the journal is respected, or that any meaningful peer review occurs. Journals that are not peer reviewed by the wider academic community should not be considered reliable, except to show the views of the groups represented by those journals. [note 1] Predatory journals – Predatory journals are ...

  6. Academic publishing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_publishing

    Peer review is a central concept for most academic publishing; other scholars in a field must find a work sufficiently high in quality for it to merit publication. A secondary benefit of the process is an indirect guard against plagiarism since reviewers are usually familiar with the sources consulted by the author(s).

  7. Wikipedia:Evaluating sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Evaluating_sources

    Sources of information are commonly categorized as primary, secondary, or tertiary sources.In brief, a primary source is one close to the event with firsthand knowledge (for example, an eyewitness); a secondary source is at least one step removed (for example, a book about an event written by someone not involved in it); and a tertiary source is an encyclopaedia or textbook that provides a ...

  8. Bias, Credibility and Appellate Review in Custody Litigation

    www.aol.com/news/bias-credibility-appellate...

    Matrimonial Practice columnist Timothy M. Tippins writes: The recent decision of the Appellate Division, Third Department, in 'Montoya v. Davis', presents an interesting example of the interaction ...

  9. Credibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credibility

    Credibility dates back to Aristotle's theory of Rhetoric.Aristotle defines rhetoric as the ability to see what is possibly persuasive in every situation. He divided the means of persuasion into three categories, namely Ethos (the source's credibility), Pathos (the emotional or motivational appeals), and Logos (the logic used to support a claim), which he believed have the capacity to influence ...