When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Disparate impact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact

    The disparate impact theory has application also in the housing context under Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, also known as the Fair Housing Act. The ten federal appellate courts that have addressed the issue have all determined that one may establish a Fair Housing Act violation through the disparate impact theory of liability.

  3. Smith v. City of Jackson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._City_of_Jackson

    Smith v. City of Jackson, 544 U.S. 228 (2005), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 30, 2005. It concerned the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) and the disparate impact theory.

  4. Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Department_of...

    Justice Alito argued that the Fair Housing Act never authorized such disparate impact claims in 1968, when the law was enacted, "[a]nd nothing has happened since then to change the law's meaning". [16] Justice Thomas also issued a separate dissenting opinion in which he questioned Justice Kennedy's reliance upon Griggs v.

  5. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griggs_v._Duke_Power_Co.

    Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), was a court case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on December 14, 1970. It concerned employment discrimination and the disparate impact theory, and was decided on March 8, 1971. [1]

  6. Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watson_v._Fort_Worth_Bank...

    On certiorari, the United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remanded the case for further proceedings. Seven members of the Court (1) agreed that disparate impact analysis may be applied to allegedly discriminatory subjective or discretionary employment practices, and (2) agreed regarding certain aspects of the evidentiary standards applicable in such case

  7. Hazelwood School District v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazelwood_School_District...

    Case history; Prior: Judgment for defendants, 392 F. Supp. 1276 (E.D. Mo. 1975); reversed, 534 F.2d 805 (8th Cir. 1976); certiorari granted, 429 U.S. 1037 (year).: Holding; In addition to considering the correct relevant labor market in a Title VII disparate-impact case, consider whether the impact that could have been caused by actions taken before Title VII was applied to the employer.

  8. Implicit theories of intelligence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit_theories_of...

    An individual's motivation towards achievement is shaped by their implicit theory of intelligence (and their related implicit theories about domain-specific aptitudes) and its associated goals. J.G. Nicholls proposed two different types of goals related to achievement. Task involvement goals involve individuals aiming to improve their own ...

  9. Social impact theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_impact_theory

    Social Impact Theory was created by Bibb Latané in 1981 and consists of four basic rules which consider how individuals can be "sources or targets of social influence". [1] Social impact is the result of social forces, including the strength of the source of impact, the immediacy of the event, and the number of sources exerting the impact. [2]