Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In mathematics, a set A is a subset of a set B if all elements of A are also elements of B; B is then a superset of A. It is possible for A and B to be equal; if they are unequal, then A is a proper subset of B. The relationship of one set being a subset of another is called inclusion (or sometimes containment).
If A is a subset of B, then one can also say that B is a superset of A, that A is contained in B, or that B contains A. In symbols, A ⊆ B means that A is a subset of B, and B ⊇ A means that B is a superset of A. Some authors use the symbols ⊂ and ⊃ for subsets, and others use these symbols only for proper subsets. For clarity, one can ...
In the mathematical field of set theory, an ideal is a partially ordered collection of sets that are considered to be "small" or "negligible". Every subset of an element of the ideal must also be in the ideal (this codifies the idea that an ideal is a notion of smallness), and the union of any two elements of the ideal must also be in the ideal.
A third pair of operators ⊂ and ⊃ are used differently by different authors: some authors use A ⊂ B and B ⊃ A to mean A is any subset of B (and not necessarily a proper subset), [34] [12] while others reserve A ⊂ B and B ⊃ A for cases where A is a proper subset of B. [33] Examples: The set of all humans is a proper subset of the set ...
For example, {1, 2} is a subset of {1, 2, 3}, and so is {2} but {1, 4} is not. As implied by this definition, a set is a subset of itself. For cases where this possibility is unsuitable or would make sense to be rejected, the term proper subset is defined. A is called a proper subset of B if and only if A is a subset of B, but A is not equal to B.
2. A proper subset of a set X is a subset not equal to X. 3. A proper forcing is a forcing notion that does not collapse any stationary set 4. The proper forcing axiom asserts that if P is proper and D α is a dense subset of P for each α<ω 1, then there is a filter G P such that D α ∩ G is nonempty for all α<ω 1
In constructive mathematics, "not empty" and "inhabited" are not equivalent: every inhabited set is not empty but the converse is not always guaranteed; that is, in constructive mathematics, a set that is not empty (where by definition, "is empty" means that the statement () is true) might not have an inhabitant (which is an such that ).
A simple example is , the set of natural numbers. From Galileo's paradox , there exists a bijection that maps every natural number n to its square n 2 . Since the set of squares is a proper subset of N {\displaystyle \mathbb {N} } , N {\displaystyle \mathbb {N} } is Dedekind-infinite.