Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 (1972) — extended from violent crimes to drug possession; United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873 (1975) — not ok for immigration to stop car based solely on "mexican appearance" of occupants; United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544 (1980) — "free to leave" United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411 ...
The Terry stop operates under the assumption that although stop-and-frisk is an intrusion, the potential harm from weapons outweighs it. [16] The cases following Terry expanded the power of the police. While the original case was concerned with armed violence and firsthand observation by officers, Adams v.
Stop-and-frisk was an issue in the 2013 mayoral election. The race to succeed Bloomberg was won by Democratic Party candidate Bill de Blasio, who had pledged to reform the stop-and-frisk program, called for new leadership at the NYPD, an inspector general, and a strong racial profiling bill. [42]
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime.
racial profiling and unlawful stop and frisk: De Beers Diamonds Antitrust Litigation: U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey: Doe v. Chiquita Brands International: funding and arming known terrorist organizations: Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores: discriminating against women in promotions, pay, and job assignments: United States Supreme ...
A Terry stop is the legal justification for police tactics like "stop and frisk", the application of which has been controversial to some. [9] Sharpe specifically focused on the length of Terry stops, whereas much of the controversy focuses on other parts of the Terry framework, like use of force and legality of certain "frisk" tactics. [8]
Opponents of stop-and-frisk believe that it is unconstitutional, ineffective, and racist. Most cases in which stop and frisk is used are a result of the War on Drugs. [26] In line with this, the majority of those targeted are racial minorities, specifically African Americans. [26]
Florida v. J. L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that a police officer may not legally stop and frisk someone based solely on an anonymous tip that describes a person's location and appearance, but does not furnish information as to any illegal conduct.