When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Opposing Viewpoints series - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposing_Viewpoints_series

    Opposing Viewpoints is a series of books on current issues which seeks to explore the varying opinions in a balanced pros/cons debate. The series attempts to encourage critical thinking and issue awareness by providing opposing views on contentious issues.

  3. Gale (publisher) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gale_(publisher)

    Gale is a global provider of research and digital learning resources. The company is based in Farmington Hills, Michigan , United States, [ 2 ] west of Detroit . It has been a division of Cengage since 2007.

  4. Wikipedia:Gale - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Gale

    Selected content from Gale Virtual Reference Library including American Decades and Baker's Biographical Dictionary of Musicians. Biography In Context , a database of biographical entries containing biographies on more than 400,000 people from over 170 sources.

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    Consensus can change, and context matters tremendously when determining how to use this list. Only sources that have been repeatedly raised for discussion are listed here, it is not a general or comprehensive list of all generally reliable or unreliable sources in the world, it is a summarization of discussions about the listed sources.

  6. Cengage Group - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cengage_Group

    International Thomson acquired reference publisher Gale Research in 1985. [11] International Thomson acquired South-Western Publishing from SFN in 1986. [12] In 1992, Thomson acquired Course Technology. [13] In 1995, Thomson acquired educational reference publisher Peterson's. [14] In 1997, Van Nostrand Reinhold was sold to John Wiley & Sons. [15]

  7. List of topics characterized as pseudoscience - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_topics...

    Detailed discussion of these topics may be found on their main pages. These characterizations were made in the context of educating the public about questionable or potentially fraudulent or dangerous claims and practices, efforts to define the nature of science, or humorous parodies of poor scientific reasoning.

  8. Wikipedia : Potentially unreliable sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Potentially...

    However, be aware of WP:Citing sources#Say where you read it - unless the complete source is available, excerpts may be taken out of context, or changed to fit the site's POV, and are therefore unreliable. Transcripts of content are generally not reliable unless produced by a reliable source.

  9. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    The following examples cover only some of the possible types of reliable sources and source reliability issues, and are not intended to be exhaustive. Proper sourcing always depends on context; common sense and editorial judgment are an indispensable part of the process.