Ads
related to: 43.6% to a fraction in decimal conversion rules 1study.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
If the repetend is a zero, this decimal representation is called a terminating decimal rather than a repeating decimal, since the zeros can be omitted and the decimal terminates before these zeros. [1] Every terminating decimal representation can be written as a decimal fraction, a fraction whose denominator is a power of 10 (e.g. 1.585 ...
To change 1 / 3 to a decimal, divide 1.000... by 3 (" 3 into 1.000... "), and stop when the desired accuracy is obtained, e.g., at 4 decimals with 0.3333. The fraction 1 / 4 can be written exactly with two decimal digits, while the fraction 1 / 3 cannot be written exactly as a
The base determines the fractions that can be represented; for instance, 1/5 cannot be represented exactly as a floating-point number using a binary base, but 1/5 can be represented exactly using a decimal base (0.2, or 2 × 10 −1).
The final conversion is from binary to decimal fractions. The only difficulty arises with repeating fractions, but otherwise the method is to shift the fraction to an integer, convert it as above, and then divide by the appropriate power of two in the decimal base. For example:
In Australia, macronutrient fertilizers are labeled with an "N-P-K-S" system, which uses elemental mass fractions rather than the standard N-P-K values and includes the amount of sulfur (S) contained in the fertilizer. [5] Fertilizers with additional macronutrients (S, Ca, Mg) may add more numbers to the N-P-K ratio to indicate the amount. The ...
The base "Roman fraction" is S, indicating 1 ⁄ 2. The use of S (as in VIIS to indicate 7 1 ⁄ 2 ) is attested in some ancient inscriptions [ 45 ] and also in the now rare apothecaries' system (usually in the form SS ): [ 44 ] but while Roman numerals for whole numbers are essentially decimal , S does not correspond to 5 ⁄ 10 , as one might ...
He also gave two other approximations of π: π ≈ 22 ⁄ 7 and π ≈ 355 ⁄ 113, which are not as accurate as his decimal result. The latter fraction is the best possible rational approximation of π using fewer than five decimal digits in the numerator and denominator. Zu Chongzhi's results surpass the accuracy reached in Hellenistic ...
That is, fractions aren't difficult to compare if the numerator is 1 (e.g., 1 ⁄ 2 is larger than 1 ⁄ 3, which in turn is larger than 1 ⁄ 4). However, comparisons become more difficult when both numerators and denominators are mixed: 3 ⁄ 4 is larger than 5 ⁄ 7 , which in turn is larger than 2 ⁄ 3 , though this cannot be determined by ...