Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Correspondence analysis (CA) is a multivariate statistical technique proposed [1] by Herman Otto Hartley (Hirschfeld) [2] and later developed by Jean-Paul Benzécri. [3] It is conceptually similar to principal component analysis , but applies to categorical rather than continuous data.
Correspondent inference theory is a psychological theory proposed by Edward E. Jones and Keith E. Davis (1965) that "systematically accounts for a perceiver's inferences about what an actor was trying to achieve by a particular action". [1] The purpose of this theory is to explain why people make internal or external attributions.
In statistics, multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a data analysis technique for nominal categorical data, used to detect and represent underlying structures in a data set. It does this by representing data as points in a low-dimensional Euclidean space .
In multivariate analysis, canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) is an ordination technique that determines axes from the response data as a unimodal combination of measured predictors. CCA is commonly used in ecology in order to extract gradients that drive the composition of ecological communities.
Multiple factor analysis (MFA) is a factorial method [1] devoted to the study of tables in which a group of individuals is described by a set of variables (quantitative and / or qualitative) structured in groups.
Correspondence inferences were invited to a greater degree by interpretative action verbs (such as "to help") than state action or state verbs, thus suggesting that the two are produced under different circumstances. Correspondence inferences and causal attributions also differ in automaticity.
Latent semantic analysis (LSA) is a technique in natural language processing, in particular distributional semantics, of analyzing relationships between a set of documents and the terms they contain by producing a set of concepts related to the documents and terms.
The correspondence hypothesis suggests individual differences in religious beliefs and experience should correspond with individual differences in the internal working models and attachment patterns. [1] This theory suggests a "secure" IWM of self and others predicts viewing God as supporting.