When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: microsoft corporate governance case study with solution free

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Microsoft Corp. v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._United...

    The case, United States v. Microsoft Corp., was heard by the Court on February 27, 2018, with a ruling originally expected by the end of the Court's term in June 2018. [20] While the case was being decided by the Supreme Court, Congress introduced the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act ("CLOUD Act") shortly after the oral hearings ...

  3. United States v. Microsoft Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft...

    The United States DOJ's website on U.S. v. Microsoft; Microsoft's Antitrust Case, Microsoft News Center; Wired news timeline of the Microsoft antitrust case; ZDnet story on 4th anniversary of Microsoft antitrust case; ZDnet story on proposed concessions; Antitrust & the Internet: Microsoft case archive "A Case of Insecure Browsing" by Andrew Chin.

  4. Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._AT&T_Corp.

    Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp., 550 U.S. 437 (2007), [1] was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Supreme Court reversed a previous decision by the Federal Circuit and ruled in favor of Microsoft, holding that Microsoft was not liable for infringement on AT&T's patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f).

  5. Microsoft Corp. v. Lindows.com, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._Lindows...

    Microsoft v. Lindows.com, Inc. was a court case brought by Microsoft against Lindows, Inc in December 2001, claiming that the name "Lindows" was a violation of its trademark "Windows." After two and a half years of court battles, Microsoft paid US$20 million for the Lindows trademark, and Lindows Inc. became Linspire Inc.

  6. Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enfish,_LLC_v._Microsoft_Corp.

    Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 822 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2016), [1] is a 2016 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in which the court, for the second time since the United States Supreme Court decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank upheld the patent–eligibility of software patent claims. [2]

  7. Microsoft v. United States (2016) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_v._United_States...

    Microsoft argued that it was unconstitutional for the government to indefinitely ban Microsoft from informing its users that the government was requesting their emails and other documents, and that the Fourth Amendment made it so people or businesses had the right to know if the government searches or seizes their property. [4]

  8. Microsoft Operations Framework - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Operations_Framework

    Governance, Risk, and Compliance The interrelated disciplines of governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) represent a cornerstone of MOF 4.0. IT governance is a senior management–level activity that clarifies who holds the authority to make decisions, determines accountability for actions and responsibility for outcomes, and addresses how ...

  9. Criticism of Microsoft - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Microsoft

    Microsoft is the largest American corporate user of H-1B guest worker visas and has joined other large technology companies like Google in recently lobbying for looser H-1B visa restrictions. [75] [76] [77] Jesse Jackson believes Microsoft should hire more minorities and women. Jackson has urged other companies to diversify their workforce.