When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: non incendive vs intrinsically safe

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Electrical equipment in hazardous areas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_equipment_in...

    Equipment can be designed or modified for safe operation in hazardous locations. The two general approaches are: Intrinsic safety Intrinsic safety, also called non-incendive, limits the energy present in a system, such that it is insufficient to ignite a hazardous atmosphere under any conditions. This includes both low power levels, and low ...

  3. Intrinsic safety - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrinsic_safety

    Intrinsic safety (IS) is a protection technique for safe operation of electrical equipment in hazardous areas by limiting the energy, electrical and thermal, available for ignition. In signal and control circuits that can operate with low currents and voltages, the intrinsic safety approach simplifies circuits and reduces installation cost over ...

  4. Inherent safety - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inherent_safety

    (Kletz originally used the term intrinsically safe in 1978, but as this had already been used for the special case of electronic equipment in potentially flammable atmospheres, only the term inherent was adopted. Intrinsic safety may be considered a special subset of inherent safety). In 2010 the American Institute of Chemical Engineers ...

  5. Foundation Fieldbus H1 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_Fieldbus_H1

    A more recent enhancement for intrinsically safe applications is the High Power Trunk (HPT) with field-based field barriers (FBs), which limits power at the spur, rather than the trunk. This method significantly changes the equation for end users of Fieldbus in hazardous settings.

  6. Safety integrity level - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_integrity_level

    In order to achieve a given SIL, the device must meet targets for the maximum probability of dangerous failure and a minimum safe failure fraction. The concept of 'dangerous failure' must be rigorously defined for the system in question, normally in the form of requirement constraints whose integrity is verified throughout system development.

  7. Functional safety - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_Safety

    The objective of functional safety is freedom from unacceptable risk of physical injury or of damage to the health of people either directly or indirectly (through damage to property or to the environment) by the proper implementation of one or more automatic protection functions (often called safety functions).

  8. Combustibility and flammability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combustibility_and...

    The word "inflammable" may be erroneously thought to mean "non-flammable". [3] The erroneous usage of the word "inflammable" is a significant safety hazard. Therefore, since the 1950s, efforts to put forward the use of "flammable" in place of "inflammable" were accepted by linguists, and it is now the accepted standard in American English and ...

  9. Talk:Intrinsic safety - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Intrinsic_safety

    Merge with Intrinsically safe - I agree that the two articles should be merged; they are about the same subject. The main article should be Intrinsic safety as that is the name of the subject. "intrinsically safe" is an adjectival clause to describe equipment that is intrinsically safe. Canthusus 14:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)