Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A review article is an article that summarizes the current state of understanding on a topic within a certain discipline. [1] [2] A review article is generally considered a secondary source since it may analyze and discuss the method and conclusions in previously published studies.
Producing a literature review is often part of a graduate and post-graduate requirement, included in the preparation of a thesis, dissertation, or a journal article. Literature reviews are also common in a research proposal or prospectus (the document approved before a student formally begins a dissertation or thesis).
I've listed this article for peer review because... Thinking about trying to shepherd this up to GA and possibly FA. All insights welcome, would love to get some feedback on structuring and style - art articles like this require a decent amount of analysis and opinion from critics and art historians, and it can be hard to know how best to incorporate a range of views/opinions/ideas.
Common examples of secondary research include textbooks, encyclopedias, news articles, review articles, and meta analyses. [2] [3] When conducting secondary research, authors may draw data from published academic papers, government documents, statistical databases, and historical records. [1] [4]
Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies as the producers of the work . [1] It functions as a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are used to maintain quality standards, improve performance, and provide credibility.
Reviewing new articles; Peer review, a process for receiving ideas and feedback from other editors about articles; Featured article review and Good article reassessment, information about reviewing Featured Articles and Good Articles to see if they still qualify for that status; Specific user groups which mention reviewing include: Pending ...
Reviewers may not review articles that they have edited significantly, and they should focus on determining whether the article meets the Good article criteria. The review should not be influenced by beliefs about how the article could be made "perfect" , by how the reviewer would have written the article, or by personal feelings about the ...
It is a good idea to contact any editors who have shown prior interest in the article and ask them if they are interested in contributing to the review Paste a notification on the WikiProject Medicine talk page , which may attract an editor with specialized knowledge in that area