Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The exception proves the rule is a phrase that arises from ignorance, though common to good writers. The original word was preuves, which did not mean proves but tests. [4] In this sense, the phrase does not mean that an exception demonstrates a rule to be true or to exist, but that it tests the rule, thereby proving its value.
Exception that proves the rule; Kompetenz-kompetenz; Legal certainty; Nulla poena sine lege, no penalty without a law; Reserved powers; Rule of law; Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the principle of federalism and states' rights; Vagueness doctrine
Paleontologist and pop science writer Stephen Jay Gould defined this expression using the 'tests' meaning of 'proves.' As mentioned in this article, in this sense the expression means that when an exception to a rule is found, that exception can be used to test whether the rule really holds, or whether it needs to be modified or rejected.
(Neil Gaiman is the classic exception that proves the rule, ... Praise from the likes of S.A. Cosby, Megan Abbott and Don Winslow mean Jordan Harper is one to check out.
The meaning of "the exception proves the rule" is probably best seen in an example: a traffic sign that says "Only emergency vehicles may park here" is equivalent to a rule "No parking here - except by emergency vehicles". The exception - which is explicit - proves the existence of the general rule ("no parking") - which is not.
However, under Federal Rule of Evidence 801 and the minority of U.S. jurisdictions that have adopted this rule, a prior inconsistent statement may be introduced as evidence of the truth of the statement itself if the prior statement was given in live testimony and under oath as part of a formal hearing, proceeding, trial, or deposition. [2]
A bride-to-be has been defended after she refused to make an exception to her childfree wedding rule.. In a recent post shared to the popular “Am I The A**hole?” Reddit forum, the woman ...
The metamathematical value of the principle of explosion is that for any logical system where this principle holds, any derived theory which proves ⊥ (or an equivalent form, ) is worthless because all its statements would become theorems, making it impossible to distinguish truth from falsehood.