Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Among the important catalysts of the subprime crisis were the influx of money from the private sector, the banks entering into the mortgage bond market, government policies aimed at expanding homeownership, speculation by many home buyers, and the predatory lending practices of the mortgage lenders, specifically the adjustable-rate mortgage, 2 ...
Key takeaways. A subprime mortgage might be an option for a low-credit score borrower who can’t qualify for a conventional mortgage. There are laws in place to protect subprime borrowers from ...
The value of U.S. subprime mortgages was estimated at $1.3 trillion as of March 2007, [18] with over 7.5 million first-lien subprime mortgages outstanding. [19] Approximately 16% of subprime loans with adjustable rate mortgages (ARM) were 90-days delinquent or in foreclosure proceedings as of October 2007, roughly triple the rate of 2005. [20]
The term subprime refers to the credit quality of particular borrowers, who have weakened credit histories and a greater risk of loan default than prime borrowers. [5] As people become economically active, records are created relating to their borrowing, earning, and lending histories.
Private lenders pushed subprime mortgages to capitalize on this, aided by greater market power for mortgage originators and less market power for mortgage securitizers. [21] Subprime mortgages amounted to $35 billion (5% of total originations) in 1994, [ 140 ] 9% in 1996, [ 141 ] $160 billion (13%) in 1999, [ 140 ] and $600 billion (20%) in 2006.
The United States Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (commonly referred to as HERA) was designed primarily to address the subprime mortgage crisis.It authorized the Federal Housing Administration to guarantee up to $300 billion in new 30-year fixed rate mortgages for subprime borrowers if lenders wrote down principal loan balances to 90 percent of current appraisal value.
Federal Reserve data found more than 84% of the subprime mortgages in 2006 coming from private-label institutions rather than Fannie and Freddie, and the share of subprime loans insured by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac decreasing as the bubble got bigger (from a high of insuring 48% to insuring 24% of all subprime loans in 2006). [81]
No doc loans were popular in the early 2000s, but were largely phased out following the subprime mortgage crisis. Low-doc loans carry a higher interest rate and were theoretically available only to borrowers with excellent credit and additional income that may be hard to document (e.g. self-employment income).