Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Contentious material is material that people might take a position on for ideological reasons. Contested material is just material that another editor has made a reasonable challenge to or where sources disagree. (Whether a person was born on April 19 or April 20 might be contested but it's not an ideological issue.)
In the 2024 RfC, editors generally agreed that Al-Manar is generally unreliable for topics that are controversial, especially with regards to the Arab–Israeli conflict. See also: Al-Manar (general topics). 1 Alexa Internet 2022. 1 2 3 A. 2022 Alexa Internet was a web traffic analysis company owned by Amazon and discontinued as of May 2022.
Any publication with a fringe topic in its name should be treated with caution: most only serve to promote that topic and are not reliable sources for anything other than their own viewpoint. Examples of such promotional journals include Creation Research Society Quarterly , Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine , and Homeopathy .
Editors should avoid original research especially with regard to making blanket statements based on novel syntheses of disparate material. Stated simply, any statement in Wikipedia that academic consensus exists on a topic must be sourced rather than being based on the opinion or assessment of editors.
A reliable source is one that presents a well-reasoned theory or argument supported by strong evidence. Reliable sources include scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or books written by researchers for students and researchers, which can be found in academic databases and search engines like JSTOR and Google Scholar.
In a 2017 article, Cara Berg, a reference librarian and co-coordinator of user education at William Paterson University emphasizes website evaluation as a tool for active research. [5] At Berg's university, for example, library instruction is given to roughly 300 different classes, each in different subjects that require some type of research ...
[g] Exercise caution when using such sources: if the information in question is suitable for inclusion, someone else will probably have published it in independent, reliable sources. [1] Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer.
This approach is particularly useful for claims made in sources that are of lower quality than their peers. If breaking-news coverage of an event identifies Richard Roe as a resident of Springfield, but all subsequent coverage says he is from Shelbyville, and the misidentification is not itself encyclopedically notable, we can likely say ...