When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Reliability of open government data - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliability_of...

    If we use the credibility estimates from multiples research papers, then how do we combine them? One solution would be to assign credibility parameters to each of the research papers and/or researchers, and take weighted medians (medians for robustness). These could be initially set to, e.g. 0.5, and then raised or lowered based on qualitative ...

  3. Journal ranking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_ranking

    Journal ranking is widely used in academic circles in the evaluation of an academic journal's impact and quality. Journal rankings are intended to reflect the place of a journal within its field, the relative difficulty of being published in that journal, and the prestige associated with it.

  4. Credibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credibility

    Credibility dates back to Aristotle's theory of Rhetoric.Aristotle defines rhetoric as the ability to see what is possibly persuasive in every situation. He divided the means of persuasion into three categories, namely Ethos (the source's credibility), Pathos (the emotional or motivational appeals), and Logos (the logic used to support a claim), which he believed have the capacity to influence ...

  5. Barry Posner (leadership scholar) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Posner_(leadership...

    A Coach's Guide to Developing Exemplary Leaders: Making the Most of The Leadership Challenge and the Leadership Practices Inventory. Hoboken: Pfeiffer (2010) Credibility: How Leaders Gain and Lose It, Why People Demand It. Hoboken: Jossey-Bass (1993). A Leader's Legacy. Hoboken: Jossey-Bass (2006). ISBN 9780787982966

  6. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    For example, a paper reviewing existing research, a review article, monograph, or textbook is often better than a primary research paper. When relying on primary sources, extreme caution is advised. Wikipedians should never interpret the content of primary sources for themselves (see Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Neutral point of ...

  7. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Most_Published...

    Despite skepticism about extreme statements made in the paper, Ioannidis's broader argument and warnings have been accepted by a large number of researchers. [7] The growth of metascience and the recognition of a scientific replication crisis have bolstered the paper's credibility, and led to calls for methodological reforms in scientific research.

  8. Wikipedia:How to increase Wikipedia's credibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_to_increase...

    The following research by political scientist Sverrir Steinsson, published in the American Political Science Review, lays out some facts about Wikipedia's credibility: . A qualitative content analysis shows that Wikipedia transformed from a dubious source of information in its early years to an increasingly reliable one over time.

  9. Wikipedia:Tiers of reliability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tiers_of_reliability

    Books published by university presses, e.g. Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press Specialist encyclopedias, e.g. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The J. R. R. Tolkien Encyclopedia