Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970), [1] was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States affirmed that there are no constitutional barriers in place to prevent a judge from accepting a guilty plea from a defendant who wants to plead guilty, while still protesting his innocence, under duress, as a detainee status.
The Alford guilty plea is named after the United States Supreme Court case of North Carolina v. Alford (1970). [10] [12] Henry Alford had been indicted on a charge of first-degree murder in 1963. Evidence in the case included testimony from witnesses that Alford himself had said, after the victim's death, that he had killed the individual.
This list of U.S. states by Alford plea usage documents usage of the form of guilty plea known as the Alford plea in each of the U.S. states in the United States. An Alford plea (also referred to as Alford guilty plea [1] [2] [3] and Alford doctrine [4] [5] [6]) in the law of the United States is a guilty plea in criminal court, [7] [8] [9] where the defendant does not admit the act and ...
North Carolina v. Alford. U.S. Supreme Court case. Citation: 400 US 25. Date: 23 November 1970: Source: United States Reports: Author: Supreme Court of the United States: Permission (Reusing this file) PD-USGov
Alford plea, in US law North Carolina v. Alford, the Supreme Court case concerning the Alford plea; See also. Allford (disambiguation)
The following is an incomplete list of notable individuals that have entered an Alford plea.An Alford plea (also referred to as Alford guilty plea [1] [2] [3] and Alford doctrine) [4] [5] [6] in the law of the United States is a guilty plea in criminal court, [7] [8] [9] where the defendant does not admit the act and asserts innocence.
North Carolina v. Alford This page was last edited on 7 June 2012, at 02:14 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License ...
An Alford plea bypasses the full process of a criminal trial. [6] The primary distinction between an Alford plea and a nolo contendere plea is that, in an Alford plea, the defendant pleads guilty (in a formal sense) yet in a nolo contendere plea, the defendant does not assert innocence or guilt. A formal admission of guilt under an Alford plea ...