Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex, 442 U.S. 1 (1979), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when state law requires the state to grant parole whenever a prisoner satisfies certain conditions, due process requires the state to allow the prisoner to present evidence in support of his request for parole and to furnish a written ...
The decision of Montgomery barred the use of life sentences without parole "for all but the rarest of juvenile offenders, those whose crimes reflect permanent incorrigibility". [4] Following Miller and Montgomery , several states adjusted their laws to reflect the Court's rulings but Mississippi remained a state where life sentences could still ...
Federal Criminal Legislative Framework. Legislation or criminal law regarding probation and parole may differ depending on the country or more specifically the state. Generally, probation refers to community-based supervision directly ordered by the court for the significant object of fulfilling incarcerated sentence.
As of Oct. 23, the board had granted parole in approximately 31% of the cases it heard this year in which it rendered a decision, according to California Department of Corrections and ...
L.A. County Dist. Atty. Gascón's decision to seek to resentence Erik and Lyle Menendez is just the first step in what could be a lengthy process to get the brothers released from prison.
Pistorius' appeal says he was eligible six months ago when he attended a parole hearing and was denied early release. He attended the hearing on March 31 and a parole board ruled he was not ...
Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that juvenile offenders cannot be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole for non-homicide offenses.
The Court agreed with the trial judge that the provision was unconstitutional, but held that reading in discretion was too intrusive of a remedy and that he should have instead struck the provision down. It in turn reduced Bissonnette's sentence to one of life imprisonment with no parole eligibility for 25 years. [3]: paras 20 & 24