When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Experts say Biden has a constitutional right to issue ...

    www.aol.com/experts-biden-constitutional-issue...

    "The Supreme Court has recognized the president’s flexibility in this area." Risk of weaponizing clemency But Crouch cautioned that the use of preemptive pardons can be a slippery slope.

  3. Biden's sweeping Hunter pardon at odds with longtime ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/bidens-sweeping-hunter-pardon...

    In their decision, justices writing for the 4-3 Supreme Court majority said that presidents are entitled to absolute immunity from any actions taken within the scope of "core constitutional powers ...

  4. 'Alarming' vs 'narrow': Senate split on Supreme Court ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/alarming-vs-narrow-senate-split...

    In an appeal of the federal charges, the Supreme Court ruled July 1 that former presidents are shielded from criminal charges for core functions of the job, such as vetoes or pardons ...

  5. Trump v. United States (2024) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._United_States_(2024)

    Trump's team asked the Supreme Court to reject the expedited timeline and allow the appeals court to consider the case first. [29] [30] On December 22, the Supreme Court denied the special counsel's request, leaving the case to the appeals court. [31] On January 9, 2024, the D.C. Court of Appeals heard arguments in the immunity dispute.

  6. United States v. Klein - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Klein

    United States v. Klein, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 128 (1871), [1] was a landmark United States Supreme Court case stemming from the American Civil War (1861–1865) where Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase held that a Congressional statute "impairing the effect of a pardon, and thus infringing the constitutional power of the Executive" and was unconstitutional.

  7. Federal pardons in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_pardons_in_the...

    However, such arguments have been disputed, and since the Supreme Court has issued constitutional rulings that affirmed the president's "unlimited" pardon power, a constitutional amendment or a Supreme Court decision on a self-pardon would be required to settle the constitutionality of a self-pardon. [46] Constitutional issues of the pardon ...

  8. The Supreme Court gave presidents immunity. Legal ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-gave-presidents...

    On the other hand, the Supreme Court made clear that a president’s power to issue pardons without fear of prosecution is absolute. “The president can make crimes,” Painter said, “and offer ...

  9. Burdick v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burdick_v._United_States

    Burdick v. United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that: A pardoned person must introduce the pardon into court proceedings, otherwise the pardon is considered a private matter, unknown to and unable to be acted on by the court. No formal acceptance is necessary to give effect to the ...