Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A 1999 study of the Stony Brook University Algorithm Repository showed that, out of 75 algorithmic problems related to the field of combinatorial algorithms and algorithm engineering, the knapsack problem was the 19th most popular and the third most needed after suffix trees and the bin packing problem. [8]
The continuous knapsack problem may be solved by a greedy algorithm, first published in 1957 by George Dantzig, [2] [3] that considers the materials in sorted order by their values per unit weight. For each material, the amount x i is chosen to be as large as possible:
One variation of this problem assumes that the people making change will use the "greedy algorithm" for making change, even when that requires more than the minimum number of coins. Most current currencies use a 1-2-5 series , but some other set of denominations would require fewer denominations of coins or a smaller average number of coins to ...
The knapsack problem is one of the most studied problems in combinatorial optimization, with many real-life applications. For this reason, many special cases and generalizations have been examined. For this reason, many special cases and generalizations have been examined.
A greedy algorithm is any algorithm that follows the problem-solving heuristic of making the locally optimal choice at each stage. [1] In many problems, a greedy strategy does not produce an optimal solution, but a greedy heuristic can yield locally optimal solutions that approximate a globally optimal solution in a reasonable amount of time.
The quadratic knapsack problem (QKP), first introduced in 19th century, [1] is an extension of knapsack problem that allows for quadratic terms in the objective function: Given a set of items, each with a weight, a value, and an extra profit that can be earned if two items are selected, determine the number of items to include in a collection without exceeding capacity of the knapsack, so as ...
However, if is superincreasing, meaning that each element of the set is greater than the sum of all the numbers in the set lesser than it, the problem is "easy" and solvable in polynomial time with a simple greedy algorithm. In Merkle–Hellman, decrypting a message requires solving an apparently "hard" knapsack problem.
With cardinal voting, finding a utilitarian budget-allocation requires solving a knapsack problem, which is NP-hard in theory but can be solved easily in practice. There are also greedy algorithms that attain a constant-factor approximation of the maximum welfare. There are many possible utility functions for a given rated ballot: [2] [8]