When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Rapanos v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapanos_v._United_States

    Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case challenging federal jurisdiction to regulate isolated wetlands under the Clean Water Act. It was the first major environmental case heard by the newly appointed Chief Justice, John Roberts, and Associate Justice Samuel Alito. The Supreme Court heard the case ...

  3. Clean Water Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_Water_Act

    Environmental Protection Agency case that the Clean Water Act's regulatory authority of waters in the United States was limited to wetlands and waters "with a continuous surface connection" to larger bodies of water, returning to Justice Scalia's definition as outlined in his Rapanos v.

  4. Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. Army Corps of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_Waste_Agency_of...

    Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001), was a decision by the US Supreme Court that interpreted a provision of the Clean Water Act. Section 404 [ 1 ] of the Act requires permits for the discharge of dredged or fill materials into "navigable waters," which is defined by the Act as ...

  5. Clean Water Rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_Water_Rule

    The Clean Water Act is the primary federal law regulating water pollution in the United States. The language of the Clean Water Act describes itself as pertaining to "Waters of the United States". The act defines these waters as "navigable waterways", which connects the act to constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce.

  6. Opinion - Biden is trying to weaponize the Clean Air Act on ...

    www.aol.com/news/opinion-biden-trying-weaponize...

    Furthermore, the 2nd Circuit cited the Supreme Court’s 1987 holding in International Paper Co. v. Ouellette that the Clean Water Act “has been interpreted to permit only state lawsuits brought ...

  7. Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2023) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental...

    Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, 598 U.S. 651 (2023), also known as Sackett II (to distinguish it from the 2012 case), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that only wetlands and permanent bodies of water with a "continuous surface connection" to "traditional interstate navigable waters" are covered by the Clean Water Act.

  8. Migratory bird rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migratory_bird_rule

    The Clean Water Act defines the waters of the United States as [1] [2] All waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (navigable waters); All interstate waters, including interstate wetlands;

  9. United States environmental law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States...

    The United States Congress has enacted federal statutes intended to address pollution control and remediation, including for example the Clean Air Act (air pollution), the Clean Water Act (water pollution), and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, or Superfund) (contaminated site cleanup).