Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In legal contexts, pendency is the state of a case that is pending i.e. has been opened but not concluded. The judiciary in India works in hierarchy at three levels - federal or supreme court, state or high courts, and district courts. [1] The court cases is categorised into two types - civil and criminal.
Current status: Online: Indian Kanoon is an Indian law search engine. [1] [2] It was launched on 4 January 2008. The search engine has been meshed with the highest ...
The case lists and the judgements of most district courts were available [97] [98] Data is updated daily. Most District and Taluka Courts in the country are computerised. Cause list of each of the Court are available. [99] [100] Judicial service centres are available for all courts. The public assess case status, stage and next hearing dates.
Chief Justice of India, Dipak Misra was a member of the five-judge constitution bench that presided over Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India & Another Building of the Supreme Court of India. In 2017, the supreme court heard arguments for fifteen days, beginning on 2 November 2017 and finishing on 5 December 2017.
By adding Articles 15(6) and 16(6) to the Indian Constitution, the state acquired the authority to impose specific restrictions on reservations for economically weaker sections, with a maximum of 10%. The Superem court compiled all the writ under the case Janhit Abhiyan Vs Union of India.
The case was cited by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad as an example of "love jihad", who demanded that the central government make laws to stop such incidents from happening, adding that they have recorded 420 incidents of love jihad in the past ten years from New Delhi alone.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
This was overruled in the 1992 case Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India. [12] Akhil Bharatiya Soshit Karamchari Sangh (Railway) v. Union of India (1981) 1 SCC 246 [13] Upheld the "carry forward rule" of the railway board in a selection of posts above 50% reservation, allowing for "some excess". This was overruled in Indra Sawhney & Others v.