Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 was a landmark court decision in Scots delict law and English tort law by the House of Lords.It laid the foundation of the modern law of negligence in common law jurisdictions worldwide, as well as in Scotland, establishing general principles of the duty of care.
As such, new categories of negligence evolved, as in Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd, [6] to cover different types of negligent acts, rather than a coherent doctrine or ratio being taken from Donoghue v Stevenson. [7]
The first case to establish a general duty of care was Donoghue v Stevenson. [3] Famously, Mrs Donoghue claimed compensation for illness after she consumed a ginger beer containing a decomposed snail in a public house in Paisley, Scotland. The bottle was opaque so neither Mrs Donoghue nor the shopkeeper could see a snail, and at the time she ...
Tournier v National Provincial and Union Bank of England [1924] 1 KB 461; House of Lords and Privy Council. France v James Coombes & Co [1929] AC 496, definition of employee and inequality of bargaining power under section 8 of the Trade Boards Act 1909; Bell v Lever Brothers Ltd [1932] AC 161, common mistake; Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 ...
Walter Graham Leechman (1870–1943) was a Scottish solicitor and political activist who represented Mrs Donoghue in the landmark legal case Donoghue v Stevenson. Early life [ edit ]
Stevenson – a friend of Ms. Donoghue bought her a bottle of ginger beer, which contained the partially decomposed remains of a snail. Since the contract was between her friend and the shop owner, Mrs. Donoghue could not sue under the contract, but it was established that the manufacturer was in breach of a duty of care owed to her.
The complex structure theory is an argument which has been put forward in pure economic loss cases which suggests that a large chattel may be considered to consist of several parts and so damage to other "property" for the purpose of applying Donoghue v Stevenson principles.
It was therefore their duty that such passerby, "neighbour" in the language of Donoghue v. Stevenson, were, so far as reasonably practicable, protected from the various obstacles or allurements, which the workmen had brought to the site. It is clear that the safety precautions taken by the Post Office did not in this instance measure up to Lord ...