Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Arizona appellate courts have ruled that ARS 1-244 bars the retroactive application of changes to the prohibited possessor statute unless there is an express legislative declaration of retroactive intent. [30] Although the statute has been amended numerous times during its history, no such retroactive declarations have ever been passed into law.
Phoenix-area prosecutors are asking for high bond amounts on prohibited possessors in the wake of a shooting by a prohibited possessor that left two officers injured and one of them dead last week.
Dion Johnson was a prohibited possessor of firearms due to past criminal charges and had recently been released from the Arizona Department of Corrections several months prior. [ citation needed ] He had spent time in prison for armed robbery and aggravated assault, was listed as a known gang member, and also had complaints about fights with ...
The Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban, often called the "Lautenberg Amendment" ("Gun Ban for Individuals Convicted of a Misdemeanor Crime of Domestic Violence", Pub. L. Tooltip Public Law (United States) 104–208 (text), [1 2]), is an amendment to the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997, enacted by the 104th United States Congress in 1996, which bans access to firearms for life ...
September 4, 2024 at 8:56 PM. PHOENIX - We’re learning more about the extensive criminal history of Saul Bal, a 41-year-old man who was arrested in connection with a shooting that left two ...
v. t. e. In law, possession is the control a person intentionally exercises toward a thing. Like ownership, the possession of anything is commonly regulated under the property law of a jurisdiction. In all cases, to possess something, a person must have an intention to possess it as well as access to it and control over it.
The Phoenix Police Department is the law enforcement agency responsible for the city of Phoenix, Arizona.As of May 2024, the Phoenix Police Department comprises just over 2,500 officers, some 625 below authorized strength of 3,125 [3] [4] and more than 1,000 support personnel.
Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires law-enforcement officers to demonstrate an actual and continuing threat to their safety posed by an arrestee, or a need to preserve evidence related to the crime of arrest from tampering by the arrestee, in order to justify a warrantless ...