When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: outcome of recent patent infringement cases

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung...

    35 U.S.C. § 289. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the general title of a series of patent infringement lawsuits between Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics in the United States Court system, regarding the design of smartphones and tablet computers. Between them, the two companies have dominated the manufacturing of smartphones ...

  3. Amazon.com, Inc. v. Barnesandnoble.com, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon.com,_Inc._v._Barnes...

    patent law. e-commerce. Amazon. com, Inc. v. Barnesandnoble. com, Inc., 337 F.3d 1024 (Fed. Cir., 2001), was a court ruling at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [1] The ruling was an important early cyberlaw precedent on the matter of the technologies that enable e-commerce and whether such technologies are eligible ...

  4. Apple wins $250 US jury verdict in patent case over Masimo ...

    www.aol.com/news/masimo-smartwatches-infringe...

    But the jury awarded the tech giant, which is worth about $3.5 trillion, just $250 in damages - the statutory minimum for infringement in the United States. Apple's attorneys told the court the ...

  5. eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EBay_Inc._v._MercExchange...

    eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388 (2006), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously determined that an injunction should not be automatically issued based on a finding of patent infringement, but also that an injunction should not be denied simply on the basis that the plaintiff does not practice the patented invention. [1]

  6. Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quanta_Computer,_Inc._v...

    Thomas, joined by unanimous. Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., 553 U.S. 617 (2008), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court reaffirmed the validity of the patent exhaustion doctrine. [1] The decision made uncertain the continuing precedential value of a line of decisions in the Federal Circuit that ...

  7. Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_LLC_v._Oracle...

    The patent phase began on May 7, 2012, with the same jury. [30] By the time of trial, Oracle's patent case comprised claims from two patents, 6,061,520 (Method and system for performing static initialization), [31] (the '520 patent) and RE38104 (Method and apparatus for resolving data references in generated code). [32] (the '104 patent ...

  8. List of United States patent law cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd. - Supreme Court, 1973. Relation between patent law and antitrust law. Dann v. Johnston - Supreme Court, 1976. Patentability of a claim for a business method patent (but the decision turns on obviousness rather than patent-eligibility). Sakraida v. Ag Pro - Supreme Court, 1976.

  9. Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kimble_v._Marvel...

    Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC, 576 U.S. 446 (2015), is a significant decision of the United States Supreme Court for several reasons. One is that the Court turned back a considerable amount of academic criticism of both the patent misuse doctrine as developed by the Supreme Court and the particular legal principle at issue in the case.

  1. Ad

    related to: outcome of recent patent infringement cases