Ad
related to: tortious interference with business relationship
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Tortious interference, also known as intentional interference with contractual relations, in the common law of torts, occurs when one person intentionally damages someone else's contractual or business relationships with a third party, causing economic harm. [1]
Economic torts are tortious interference actions designed to protect trade or business. The area includes the doctrine of restraint of trade and, particularly in the United Kingdom, has largely been submerged in the twentieth century by statutory interventions on collective labour law and modern competition law, and certain laws governing intellectual property, particularly unfair competition law.
Economic torts protect people from interference with their trade or business. The area includes the doctrine of restraint of trade and has largely been submerged in the twentieth century by statutory interventions on collective labour law, modern antitrust or competition law, and certain laws governing intellectual property, particularly unfair competition law.
Tortious interference – One person intentionally damages the plaintiff's contractual or other business relationships. Conspiracy (civil) – An agreement between two or more parties to deprive a third party of legal rights or deceive a third party to obtain an illegal objective.
Students, faculty members and employees of Oberlin College protested against the bakery, alleging racism. The owners of the bakery sued Oberlin College, and Dean Meredith Raimondo in her individual capacity, for directly and indirectly supporting the protests, engaging in tortious interference of business, and for defaming the owners and employees.
A complaint filed in State District Court last summer accuses Laura and her husband, Stephen Craig, of exploitation of a vulnerable adult, unjust enrichment, undue influence, tortious interference ...
The latest lawsuit from July also charges Brin and his family office of tortious interference with a dead body, alleging that his team promised to recover Rushfeldt's body "while secretly plotting ...
OK! says that this was interference by unlawful means with its contractual or business relations or a breach of its equitable right to confidentiality in photographic images of the wedding. In Mainstream Properties Ltd v Young [2005] IRLR 964 two employees of a property company, in breach of their contracts, diverted a development opportunity ...