When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pierson v. Post - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierson_v._Post

    Pierson v. Post is generally considered the most famous property law case in American legal history. [1] Although it only involved a dispute over which of two men deserved ownership of a fox, adjudicating the dispute required determining at what point a wild animal becomes "property".

  3. Watson v. Jones - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watson_v._Jones

    The case was based upon a dispute regarding the Walnut Street Presbyterian Church in Louisville, Kentucky (also known as the Third Presbyterian Church). [3] [2] Because the Walnut Street Presbyterian Church had a clear internal authority structure, the court granted control of the property to that group, even though it was only supported by a minority of the congregation.

  4. The 10 Most Infamous Family Inheritance Feuds - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2011-06-06-the-10-most-infamous...

    Not every famous estate fight is over money, though. ... the 24/7 Wall St. list of the Most Infamous Family Estate Feuds is based as much on the notoriety of the cases as the size of the estates ...

  5. Johnson v. McIntosh - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_v._McIntosh

    Johnson ' s continuing prominence is reinforced every year in law schools, where it is the very first case most beginning students read in their required course in Property. The bestselling property casebook calls Johnson 'the genesis of our subject' because it lays 'the foundations of landownership in the United States.' Given current ...

  6. Kelo v. City of New London - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

    Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development does not violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

  7. Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberson_v._Rochester...

    On 1 August 1900, the trial was held in Supreme Court Monroe County. [7] The defendants (Franklin Mills and the Rochester Folding Box Co.) contended to have the case dismissed over the fact that they had the right to use Roberson's picture and there existed no laws that could restrain them from using the picture.

  8. Estate of Martin Luther King, Jr., Inc. v. CBS, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estate_of_Martin_Luther...

    Estate of Martin Luther King, Jr., Inc. v. CBS, Inc. (194 F.3d 1211 (11th Cir. 1999)) [1] is a United States court case that involved a longstanding dispute about the public domain copyright status of the text of Martin Luther King Jr.'s famous speech, known by the key phrase "I Have a Dream", originally delivered at the August 1963 March on ...

  9. Popov v. Hayashi - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popov_v._Hayashi

    Popov v. Hayashi (WL 31833731 Ca. Sup. Ct. 2002) was a California Superior Court case involving scope of ownership between parties and conversion regarding a valuable baseball acquired at a Major League Baseball game. The question present in this case is who has ownership of an item when one acquired it legally, but lost it due to the criminal ...