When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: suing for emotional distress lawsuit

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Intentional infliction of emotional distress - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_infliction_of...

    Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED; sometimes called the tort of outrage) [1] is a common law tort that allows individuals to recover for severe emotional distress caused by another individual who intentionally or recklessly inflicted emotional distress by behaving in an "extreme and outrageous" way. [2]

  3. Chris Brown Sues Warner Bros. for $500 Million Over Sexual ...

    www.aol.com/chris-brown-sues-warner-bros...

    In the lawsuit obtained by Variety, Brown accuses the producers behind the docuseries, which includes Warner Bros. and Ample, of libel and intentional infliction of emotional distress through ...

  4. Chris Brown Sues Warner Bros. for $500 Million Over ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/chris-brown-sues-warner-bros...

    Brown is suing for alleged defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress and using his name and likeness for promotional purposes. He is asking for $500,000 in damages and a jury trial.

  5. A California couple is suing JetBlue for $1 million ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/california-couple-suing...

    The couple is seeking compensation for loss of work and the need to relocate including $300,000 for emotional distress, $300,000 for pain, suffering, and inconvenience, $40,000 in medical expenses ...

  6. Ice chunk from JetBlue plane crashed through couple's ceiling ...

    www.aol.com/ice-chunk-jetblue-plane-crashed...

    A California couple is suing for $1 million in damages, citing property damage and emotional distress. ... The lawsuit claims the chunk of ice was "the size of a watermelon" and the couple "barely ...

  7. Hustler Magazine v. Falwell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell

    Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that parodies of public figures, even those intending to cause emotional distress, are protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.