When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: reasonable suspicion drug testing

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Reasonable suspicion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_suspicion

    Reasonable suspicion is a legal standard of proof that in United States law is less than probable cause, the legal standard for arrests and warrants, but more than an "inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or 'hunch ' "; [1] it must be based on "specific and articulable facts", "taken together with rational inferences from those facts", [2] and the suspicion must be associated with the ...

  3. Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernonia_School_District...

    Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646 (1995), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision which upheld the constitutionality of random drug testing regimen implemented by the local public schools in Vernonia, Oregon. Under that regimen, student-athletes were required to submit to random drug testing before being allowed to participate in ...

  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Ass'n - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skinner_v._Railway_Labor...

    However, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Skinner that random drug testing is permissible for employees in safety sensitive positions. Justice Kennedy, speaking for the majority, wrote: [T]he Government interest in testing without a showing of individualized suspicion is compelling.

  5. Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the...

    Jardines (2013), to rule that bringing a drug detection dog to sniff at the front door of a home was a search. [72] In many situations, law enforcement may perform a search when they have a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, even if it falls short of probable cause necessary for an arrest. Under Terry v.

  6. Chandler v. Miller - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandler_v._Miller

    The Court noted that while the Fourth Amendment generally prohibits officials from conducting search and seizures without individualized suspicion, there does exist a "closely guarded" category of permissible suspicionless searches and seizures. However, the Court held that the statute's drug-testing requirement did not fit within this category.

  7. Board of Education v. Earls - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Board_of_Education_v._Earls

    Board of Education v. Earls, 536 U.S. 822 (2002), was a case by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that it does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution for public schools to conduct mandatory drug testing on students participating in extracurricular activities.