When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Anti-Hazing Act of 1995 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Hazing_Act_of_1995

    The Anti-Hazing Act of 1995, officially designated as Republic Act No. 8049, is a Philippine law that regulates the acts of hazing and other initiation rites in fraternities and sororities in the country. It prohibits and penalizes physical harm and violence in such practices.

  3. National Privacy Commission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Privacy_Commission

    The initial definition was offered first in Republic Act 8792, Section 32 better known as the eCommerce Act of the Philippines and was formally introduced by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) on its Department Administrative Order #08 – Defining Guidelines for the Protection of Personal Data in Information Private Sector.

  4. Magna Carta for Philippine Internet Freedom - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_Carta_for_Philippine...

    The Magna Carta for Philippine Internet Freedom (abbreviated as MCPIF, or #MCPIF for online usage) is an internet law bill filed in the Congress of the Philippines.The bill contains provisions promoting civil and political rights and Constitutional guarantees for Philippine internet users, such as freedom of expression, as well as provisions on information and communications technology (ICT ...

  5. Death of John Matthew Salilig - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_John_Matthew_Salilig

    The Republic Act No. 8049 or the Anti-Hazing Law was first enacted in 1995 following the 1991 death of Lenny Villa, a student from Ateneo de Manila University. The law was amended and supplemented in 2018 following the death of Horatio Castillo, a student from the University of Santo Tomas, in 2017. Despite this, the practice of hazing still ...

  6. YouTube and privacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_and_privacy

    On March 12, 2007, Viacom sued YouTube, demanding $1 billion in damages, said that it had found more than 150,000 unauthorized clips of its material on YouTube that had been viewed "an astounding 1.5 billion times". YouTube responded by stating that it "goes far beyond its legal obligations in assisting content owners to protect their works". [4]

  7. OpenAI could be in a ‘clear violation’ of YouTube’s terms of ...

    www.aol.com/finance/openai-could-clear-violation...

    The admission came from a filing OpenAI submitted to the British House of Lords when the U.K. government was considering a new law that would limit how AI companies could use copyrighted material.

  8. Disini v. Secretary of Justice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disini_v._Secretary_of_Justice

    Court: Supreme Court of the Philippines en banc: Full case name; Jose Jesus M. Disini, Jr., Rowena S. Disini, Lianne Ivy P. Medina, Janette Toral and Ernesto Sonido, Jr., vs. the Secretary of Justice, the Secretary of the Department of the Interior and Local Government, the Executive Director of the Information and Communications Technology Office, the Chief of the Philippine National Police ...

  9. People of the Philippines v. Santos, Ressa and Rappler

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_of_the_Philippines...

    The Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (R.A. 10175) was signed into law by President Benigno Aquino III on September 12, 2012, becoming effective on October 3. [6] Among the actions criminalized by this law is "cyberlibel". [6] Six days after the law commenced, the Supreme Court issued a temporary restraining order to stop its implementation.