When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: input hypothesis by stephen krashen

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Input hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Input_hypothesis

    The input hypothesis, also known as the monitor model, is a group of five hypotheses of second-language acquisition developed by the linguist Stephen Krashen in the 1970s and 1980s. Krashen originally formulated the input hypothesis as just one of the five hypotheses, but over time the term has come to refer to the five hypotheses as a group.

  3. Stephen Krashen - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Krashen

    Krashen, Stephen D. (1985), The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications, New York: Longman Krashen, Stephen D. (1989), "We Acquire Vocabulary and Spelling by Reading: Additional Evidence for the Input Hypothesis" (PDF) , The Modern Language Journal , 73 (4): 440– 464, doi : 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05325.x , archived (PDF) from the ...

  4. Theories of second-language acquisition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theories_of_second...

    By the 1980s, the theories of Stephen Krashen’s had become the prominent paradigm in the field of SLA. In his theories, often collectively known as the Input Hypothesis, Krashen suggested that language acquisition is driven solely by comprehensible input, language input that learners can understand. Krashen's model was influential in the ...

  5. Natural approach - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_Approach

    The input hypothesis. This states that language is acquired by exposure to comprehensible input at a level a little higher than that the learner can already understand. Krashen names this kind of input "i+1". [10] The natural order hypothesis. This states that learners acquire the grammatical features of a language in a fixed order, and that ...

  6. Comprehensible output - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehensible_output

    If this hypothesis is correct, then language acquirers must be forced to speak. According to Stephen Krashen, the Need Hypothesis is incorrect. However, Krashen does point out that need can be helpful when it places the acquirer in a position in which he or she can receive comprehensible input (CI). On the other hand, need is useless in the ...

  7. Second-language acquisition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-language_acquisition

    Stephen Krashen took a very strong position on the importance of input, asserting that comprehensible input is all that is necessary for second-language acquisition. [ 37 ] [ 38 ] Krashen pointed to studies showing that the length of time a person stays in a foreign country is closely linked with their level of language acquisition.

  8. Interaction hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interaction_hypothesis

    Similar to Krashen's input hypothesis, the interaction hypothesis claims that comprehensible input, which is characterized as a variety of language that can be understood by a learner, [3] is important for language learning. There are a number of ways in which input may be modified for the benefit of the learner.

  9. Interface position - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interface_position

    This view is most commonly associated with Stephen Krashen and his acquisition/learning hypothesis, one of the five hypotheses often known together as the input hypothesis. Krashen's views have been criticised by other second language acquisition researchers for their lack of falsifiability, amongst other things. [3]