When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Declaration of nullity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Nullity

    Annulment respondents who want to use canon law to defend their marriage against declarations of invalidity have the right to have a competent advocate assisting them. An advocate is like a lawyer. Respondents have the right to read the petition (called libellus, meaning "little book") of the petitioner. The petition must describe, in a general ...

  3. Department of State v. Muñoz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_State_v._Muñoz

    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the district court's ruling, on the grounds that Muñoz's right to marriage and family life was protected by the Due Process Clause and that this right was impaired by the denial of Asencio's visa request and failure of the government to provide a detailed reasoning for its decision within a reasonable ...

  4. The first legally-recognized same-sex marriage occurred in Minneapolis, [3] Minnesota, in 1971. [4] On June 26, 2015, in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court overturned Baker v. Nelson and ruled that marriage is a fundamental right guaranteed to all citizens, and thus legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

  5. Right to petition in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_petition_in_the...

    It is not necessary to say that the two Clauses are identical in their mandate or their purpose and effect to acknowledge that the rights of speech and petition share substantial common ground. This Court has said that the right to speak and the right to petition are "cognate rights." Thomas v. Collins, 323 U. S. 516, 530 (1945); see also Wayte v.

  6. Zablocki v. Redhail - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zablocki_v._Redhail

    Justice Stewart reaches a conclusion nearly identical to the Court's conclusion, but wholly rejects the Court's equal protection analysis, likening it to be the improper analysis for the denial of a right. Stewart disagrees with the majority's contention that there is a fundamental right to marry, or even an explicit right to marry at all.

  7. Supriyo v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supriyo_v._Union_of_India

    Supriyo a.k.a Supriya Chakraborty & Abhay Dang v. Union of India thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice & other connected cases (2023) are a collection of landmark cases of the Supreme Court of India, which were filed to consider whether to extend right to marry and establish a family to sexual and gender minority individuals in India. [4]

  8. Annulment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annulment

    The petition to void the marriage must be brought by one of the parties to the marriage, and a voidable marriage thus cannot be annulled after the death of one of the parties. A marriage may be voidable for a variety of reasons, depending on jurisdiction.

  9. Falcis III v. Civil Registrar-General - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcis_III_v._Civil...

    Debatable," saying that he will vote in favor of same-sex civil unions, a turnaround from previous pronouncements in 2016 and 2017 where he was against both same-sex civil unions and same-sex marriage. [13] Roman Catholic bishops praised the dismissal of the petition interpreting the high court's decision as a defense for the "sanctity of ...