Ad
related to: concept of no self in buddhism
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Buddhist scholars Richard Gombrich and Alexander Wynne argue that the Buddha's descriptions of no-self in early Buddhist texts do not deny that there is a self. [1] [2] Wynne and Gombrich both argue that the Buddha's statements on anattā were originally a "not-self" teaching that developed into a "no-self" teaching in later Buddhist thought.
Ātman (/ ˈ ɑː t m ə n /), attā or attan in Buddhism is the concept of self, and is found in Buddhist literature's discussion of the concept of non-self . [1] Most Buddhist traditions and texts reject the premise of a permanent, unchanging atman (self, soul). [2] [3]
The anattā doctrine of Buddhism denies that there is anything permanent in any person to call one's Self, and that a belief in a Self is a source of dukkha. [ 28 ] [ 29 ] Some Buddhist traditions and scholars, however, interpret the anatta doctrine to be strictly in regard to the five aggregates rather than a universal truth, despite the ...
[1] [15] The Buddha introduced the concept that there is no soul (self) tying the cycle of rebirths, in contrast to themes asserted by various Hindu and Jaina traditions, and this central concept in Buddhism is called anattā; Buddha also affirmed the idea that all compounded things are subject to dissolution at death or anicca. [31]
This is because the Buddhist doctrine of anattā (Sanskrit: anātman, no-self doctrine) rejects the concepts of a permanent self or an unchanging, eternal soul found in other religions. [113] [114] The Buddhist traditions have traditionally disagreed on what it is in a person that is reborn, as well as how quickly the rebirth occurs after death.
Reality is seen, ultimately, in Buddhism as a form of 'projection', resulting from the fruition of karmic seeds (sankharas). The precise nature of this 'illusion' that is the phenomenal universe is debated among different schools. For example; Some consider that the concept of the unreality of "reality" is confusing.
[1] [2] [3] The concept refers to ignorance or misconceptions about the nature of metaphysical reality, in particular about the impermanence and anatta doctrines about reality. [ 2 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ] It is the root cause of Dukkha (suffering, pain, unsatisfactoriness), [ 6 ] and asserted as the first link, in Buddhist phenomenology, of a process ...
The early Buddhist texts also associate dependent arising with emptiness and not-self. The early Buddhist texts outline different ways in which dependent origination is a middle way between different sets of "extreme" views (such as "monist" and "pluralist" ontologies or materialist and dualist views of mind-body relation).