When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Erie doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erie_doctrine

    The Erie doctrine is a fundamental legal doctrine of civil procedure in the United States which mandates that a federal court called upon to resolve a dispute not directly implicating a federal question (most commonly when sitting in diversity jurisdiction, but also when applying supplemental jurisdiction to claims factually related to a federal question or in an adversary proceeding in ...

  3. Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erie_Railroad_Co._v._Tompkins

    Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that the United States does not have a general federal common law and that U.S. federal courts must apply state law, not federal law, to lawsuits between parties from different states that do not involve federal questions.

  4. Forum shopping - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forum_shopping

    Under the Erie doctrine, a federal court hearing a case under the diversity jurisdiction must apply the law of the state in which the court is sitting. When a case has connection to more than just a single state, the forum state's choice of law principles generally guide the selection of what place's law will apply.

  5. Hanna v. Plumer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanna_v._Plumer

    Hanna v. Plumer, 380 U.S. 460 (1965), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, in which the Court further refined the Erie doctrine regarding when and by what means federal courts are obliged to apply state law in cases brought under diversity jurisdiction.

  6. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasperini_v._Center_For...

    Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, 518 U.S. 415 (1996), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court further refined the Erie doctrine regarding when and how federal courts are to apply state law in cases brought under diversity jurisdiction. The Court held that the New York state rule applied.

  7. Erie County Council overrides key budget vetoes, reductions ...

    www.aol.com/erie-county-council-overrides-key...

    Council voted 7-0 to override the elimination of the Erie County Human Resources Commission. Council voted 6-1 to override a nearly $500,000 cut from the $999,996 general fund transfer to Pleasant ...

  8. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaxon_Co._v._Stentor...

    Klaxon Company v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Company, 313 U.S. 487 (1941), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court applied the choice-of-law principles of Erie Railroad v. Tompkins to conflicts between laws of different states for cases sitting in federal court on diversity jurisdiction.

  9. How did an Erie Express co-owner help others in the ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/did-erie-express-co-owner-081529361.html

    Erie Express co-owner helped fans financially, and himself cathartically, during the team's 2023 Gridiron Developmental Football League home games.