Ad
related to: trademark non use cancellation agreement california pdf version full book
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A defendant claiming fair use of a trademark does not have the burden of showing its use is not likely to cause confusion; Some consumer confusion regarding the origin of the goods or services is compatible with the fair use of a trademark. American Needle, Inc. v. NFL: 560 U.S. 183: 2010: 9–0: Non-Trademark: Antitrust Majority: Stevens ...
The nominative use doctrine was first enunciated in 1992 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in New Kids on the Block v. News America Publishing, Inc. [4] In New Kids on the Block, the court had examined a "New Kids on the Block survey" performed by the defendant, and found that there was no way to ask people their opinion of the band without using its name.
California is a novel by American author Edan Lepucki described as "post-apocalyptic dystopian fiction", [1] in which characters Frida and Cal flee Los Angeles to live in the wilderness of post-apocalyptic California.
In Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada has recognised that good faith contractual performance is a general organising principle of the common law.This duty applies to all contracts, requiring parties to act honestly in the performance of their obligations, and therefore would operate to determine whether activation of a termination for convenience clause had been done in good faith.
In general, courts look beneath the surface of the agreements to conclude whether the agreements create a licensing relationship or if they amount to, in substance, sales subject to first sale doctrine under §109(a). Thus, specifying that the agreement grants only a "license" is necessary to create the licensing relationship, but not sufficient.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
In the U.S., if a trademark has been used for a continuous period of at least five years after the date of registration, the right to use the mark and the registration may become "incontestable" (e.g. invulnerable to cancellation for non-use, but not for becoming generic).
In 1893, Congress granted amnesty to late deposits of books for copyright and allowed all to send in their works for protection by March 1. The Act passed on March 3. [1] In 1895, the Printing Act of 1895 codified the Wheaton v. Peters decision and stated explicitly that "no Government publications shall be copyrighted." [1]